God is our Guide  Number 1 site for helping reverse diseases on Planet Earth

  

 CIDPUSA.ORG

 
Home
Diagnosis
Treatment
Pathology
Variants
CIDP info
Fibromyalgia
IVIG
Anti-inflammatory Diet
Burning  Feet Home
Services Page
Chronic Fatigue
Autoimmune diseases
Prognosis
Bible healing
Celiac disease

Colostrum

Hallelujah Diet

Natural Diet for diseases

Fat lowering Diet

Libido Diet

Epilepsy diet

Food additives

No artificial sweetener in diet

Breast cancer herbs

The best lifestyle

DeTox diet

Avoid Gum

Right Fat Diet

chemicals in French fries

Electrical Stimulation Therapy

Magnets and ageing

 Shifa

Cupping

Takayasu arteritis
Natural Makeup
Neck Pain
Ocular Female diseases
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Osteoporosis
Women Heart Attacks
Spices
Cure all diseases
Vinegar
Memory problems
Breast Lymph Drainage
Kidney stone Buster
Bras cause breast cancer
Skin repair Clinic
Pandas
Hepatitis

 

  Information on  diet & developmental delays    CIDPUSA Foundation

  alternatives treatment of autoimmune disease read our e-book 

Special GoogleHealth Search
 

Neurodevelopmental Delays Associated With Iron-Fortified Formula for Healthy Infants

Martha Kerr

 

May 12, 2008 (Honolulu) Healthy, well-nourished children fed iron-fortified formula as infants scored an average of 11 points lower on IQ tests at 10 years of age than similar children fed low-iron formula, investigators announced here at PAS 2008, the Pediatric Academic Societies and Asian Society for Pediatric Research Joint Meeting.

Ten-year follow-up data were examined for 494 healthy Chilean infants who were not iron-deficient at baseline at 6 months of age and who were randomly assigned to receive either iron-fortified formula, containing 12 mg/L ferrous sulfate, or low-iron formula, containing 2.3 mg/L ferrous sulfate, for a year, with the objective of preventing iron deficiency.

Principal investigator Betsy Lozoff, MD, professor of pediatrics and communicable diseases at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, reported that at 10-year follow-up, there were no background differences between the 2 groups, but there were marked differences in neurobehavioral growth and development.

Hemoglobin levels were assessed at every office visit from 6 months through 10 years. Motor development on the Bruininks-Oseretsky test, IQ scores, spatial memory, reading and arithmetic skills, and visual-motor integration were assessed to measure the effect of iron-fortified feedings on neurobehavioral growth and development, "when iron levels were normal to begin with."

The low-iron group had higher scores "on every outcome" at 10 years, Dr. Lozoff announced. The findings were significant for spatial memory and visual motor integration (P < .05) and suggestive for IQ, visual perception, and motor coordination (P < .10) compared with patients in the iron-fortified group, who scored lower on all of these measures.

Continue to  Iron fortified foods & developmental delays

 continued to IntImate Foods part-2