God  our Guide  
cidpUSA Foundation

 cidpusa.org   

 

 
      Home
      Diagnosis
      Treatment
      Pathology
      Variants
      CIDP info
      Fibromyalgia
      IVIG
      Diet anti-inflammatory
      Burning  Feet Home
      Services Page
      Chronic Fatigue
      Autoimmune diseases
      Prognosis
      Bible healing
      Celiac disease
 
  Natural Makeup
  Neck Pain
  Ocular Female diseases
  Chronic fatigue syndrome
  Osteoporosis
  Women Heart Attacks
  Breast Size & Disease
  Female Sex Disease
  PARKINSON
  Memory problems
  Breast Lymph Drainage
  Kidney stone Buster
 Bras cause breast cancer
  Skin repair Clinic
 Pandas
  Hepatitis

Clinics of Excellence

 What is Chronic Fatigue

  Guide to Chronic fatigue

     Info on CFS

  Antibodies in CFS

 

Learn about Self

Pork plant controversy

Backpain

Fibromyalgia

Personality

Electrical Stimulation Therapy

Addison

Estrogen

DNA

Magnets and ageing

Quranic Shifa

Vitamin D Deficency

Cupping

Pork plant controversy

Eliminate insulin implants

Sugar treatment

heart FAILURE

irregular periods

Myasthenia diet

 prophets

cancer survivor

Tomato as a medicine

Immune deficiency

Drug reaction prevention

   Prevent Osteoporosis

  Some rheumatic disorders

   Personality

  Alopecia treatment

   Alopecia general

  Nail Fungus

                                 Toxic section-Autoimmune diseases

                                    Get Expert Help Today  
 For a complete simple guide to natural treatment of all diseases Flame within E-book.

         

Group: 'New car smell' includes toxins 

Environmental group contends drivers, passengers are breathing dangerous chemicals found in car interiors; calls for new regs.

January 31, 2006; Posted: 8:09 a.m. EST (1309 GMT)

NEW YORK  - A Michigan environmental group is charging that at least part of the so-called "new car smell" is toxic, and that the interior of an automobile has dangerous levels of various chemicals.

The report, "Toxic at any speed," comes from The Ecology Center, an Ann Arbor, Mich.-based group. It reports that PBDEs, used as fire retardants, and phthalates, used primarily to soften PVC plastics, are found in dangerous amounts in dust and windshield film samples.

It called for tougher regulations to phase out the use of the chemicals as well as voluntary moves by the auto manufacturers to stop using the products inside of new vehicles.

It also suggested that car owners take steps to reduce the release and breakdown of these chemicals by using solar reflectors, ventilating car interiors, and parking outside of sunlight whenever possible.

The group says that phthalates are partly responsible for the smell associated with new cars.

Drivers and passengers are exposed to these chemicals through inhalation and contact with dust, according to the group's report.

"These groups of chemicals have been linked to birth defects, impaired learning, liver toxicity, premature births and early puberty in laboratory animals, among other serious health problems," according to the report.

"We can no longer rely just on seatbelts and airbags to keep us safe in cars," said a statement from Jeff Gearhart, the Ecology Center's Clean Car Campaign Director who co-authored the report. "Our research shows that autos are chemical reactors, releasing toxins before we even turn on the ignition. There are safer alternatives to these chemicals, and innovative companies that develop them first will likely be rewarded by consumers."

The group found Volvo was found to have the lowest levels of phthalates and the second-lowest levels of PBDEs, which it said made the Ford Motor Co. -owned unit the industry leader in terms of indoor air quality. Volvo also has the toughest policies for phasing out these chemicals.

Other auto manufacturers had more mixed records on the two types of chemicals, according to the group's survey. For example, Korean auto manufacturer Hyundai had the lowest level of PBDEs, but the highest level of phthalates.

The group said it was told by Ford officials that the auto manufacturer has eliminated PBDEs from "interior components that customers may come into contact with." Ford had among the lowest level of PBDEs in its vehicles, and General Motors  and BMW vehicles also had lower-than-average levels for all chemicals tested. But Mercedes, Chrysler, Toyota and Subaru had higher-than-average levels of both PBDEs and phthalates.

In response to the study, one industry group defended the use of PBDEs as an important contributor to vehicle safety.

The Bromine Science and Environmental Forum said in a statement that PBDEs known as Deca-BDE have been extensively studied in the U.S. and Europe -- including a 10-year-long risk assessment -- and found to be safe for continued use.

"If automobile manufacturers follow the guidance in the report, it could result in lowering fire safety for the public, as well as promoting the use of unidentified alternative substances about which very little may be known," said the group's statement. It said it is crucial that autos have the best possible flame retardants available in case of accidents.

"In 2004 alone, there were approximately 297,000 car fires in the United States, leading to 550 deaths. If effective flame retardants were not used, this number would certainly be higher," the group's statement said.

Auto manufacturers have already agreed to phase out two of the three flame-retardant chemicals cited in the report, Eron Shosteck, a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, told the Detroit News. The remaining chemical has been studied by the European Union for 10 years and has been proven safe, Shosteck said.

The report was released Jan. 11 during the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, but it received little attention outside of Michigan.

 

 

Some things have been said, yet so much more cannot be written about. See this message from God.