God is our Guide  Number 1 site for helping reverse diseases on Planet Earth


Breast cancer Bra
Breast Cancer Chemical
Mammogram cancer
Breast Massage
Breast Implants
Breast Exam
Breast Lymph
Breast Feeding
Bra Chemicals
Breast Cancer Herbs
Bible Diet
Breast nutrients
Diet Page
Autoimmune diseases
Cancer Book
Vitamin-D Deficiency

Breast cancer Bra


Avandia risk

More young women getting strokes

Angioplasty and stents less effective

Sand Bath


Sulphur Bath

Massage & Cancer Cure

Quick Heart Cure

Massage Benefits Parkinson

Curry Powder

Water chesnut 

Sweet potatoes  Beet Root 

 Green tea  and cancer risk

 Dementia and exercise

 Exercise and weight loss

Sleep and stay fit

Bird Flu

Multiple Sclerosis treatment

Morgellons story

MS treatment


 Magnets and ageing

 Kidney therapy



 Welcome to cidpusa Foundation     

  Guide on complete treatment of disease by alternatives read our e-book

   Return to page -1 of Mammograms causing cancer

Alert - Mammograms Cause Cancer  page-2
From Rcik Ensminger

 Dr. Bross came to the conclusion that the main cause of the rising rates of leukemia was medical radiation in the form of diagnostic medical X-rays  Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley, was wondering the same thing in the early 1990s. His research led him to write a 400-page book in which he estimates that "three-quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." Astonishingly, this isn't even news. "Medical science," Gofman continues, "has known for 20 years that ionizing radiation is a prominent and proven cause of breast-cancer"  

In other words, it appears that the diagnostic X-rays being used to detect possible breast cancer are themselves a prime cause of breast cancer. And then they turn around and recommend even higher doses of radiation to treat the cancer. Insane!!!


 M.R.I scan is a better & safer test then Mammogram

 Dr. Bross lost his funding from the National Cancer Institute when his study was published in the respected American Journal of Public Health. Dr. Bross  he came to the distressing conclusion that human exposure to ionizing radiation was far more serious than had been previously recognized. Dr. Gofman's work led to his 1995 book Preventing Breast Cancer, in which he came to a stunning conclusion: "Our estimate is that about three quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." John Gofman does not underestimate the role played in cancer causation played by pesticides, hormone pills, fatty diets, and other environmental stressors. He states: "There is no inherent conflict or competition between carcinogens," because they multiply each other's carcinogenic effects. But he finds the medical use of radiation to be so crucial that it bears repeating: "An estimated 75 per cent of recent and current breat cancer cases would not have occurred as they did, in the absence of earlier medical[and other] irradiation." Although ionizing radiation, the type delivered by X-rays and radiotherapy, is one of the few environmental contaminants known unequivocally to cause many forms of cancer, it is routinely recommended for many cancer patients. This, despite the fact that,with few exceptions, there is no proven benefit to survival."
Breast Cancer? Breast Health! The Wise Woman Way
By Susun S. Weed
Published by Ash Tree



Internet help for people in any  locations Available 
See the nerve physiology
Acupuncture in MS












World Wide Consultation by Internet