CIDPUSA.ORG Autoimmune

Mammogram radiation,

God Our Guide

Main Links Cidpusa.org

Home page
Autoimmune Diseases Guide
F.A.Q. Autoimmune
F.A.Q.
Help page
Diagnosis page
Treatment Page

Breast cancer linked to mammogram

Search Cidpusa web

Radiation Exposure From Annual Mammography Increases Breast Cancer Risk in Young High-Risk Women



Dr. Bross came to the conclusion that the main cause of the rising rates of leukemia was medical radiation in the form of diagnostic medical X-rays  Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley, was wondering the same thing in the early 1990s. His research led him to write a 400-page book in which he estimates that "three-quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." Astonishingly, this isn't even news. "Medical science," Gofman continues, "has known for 20 years that ionizing radiation is a prominent and proven cause of breast-cancer"  

 



In other words, it appears that the diagnostic X-rays being used to detect possible breast cancer are themselves a prime cause of breast cancer. And then they turn around and recommend even higher doses of radiation to treat the cancer. Insane!!!

 

 M.R.I scan is a better & safer test then Mammogram Dr. Bross lost his funding from the National Cancer Institute when his study was published in the respected American Journal of Public Health. Dr. Bross  he came to the distressing conclusion that human exposure to ionizing radiation was far more serious than had been previously recognized. Dr. Gofman's work led to his 1995 book Preventing Breast Cancer, in which he came to a stunning conclusion: "Our estimate is that about three quarters of the current annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources." John Gofman does not underestimate the role played in cancer causation played by pesticides, hormone pills, fatty diets, and other environmental stressors. He states: "There is no inherent conflict or competition between carcinogens," because they multiply each other's carcinogenic effects. But he finds the medical use of radiation to be so crucial that it bears repeating: "An estimated 75 per cent of recent and current breat cancer cases would not have occurred as they did, in the absence of earlier medical[and other] irradiation." Although ionizing radiation, the type delivered by X-rays and radiotherapy, is one of the few environmental contaminants known unequivocally to cause many forms of cancer, it is routinely recommended for many cancer patients. This, despite the fact that,with few exceptions, there is no proven benefit to survival."Breast Cancer? Breast Health! The Wise Woman Way ,By Susun S. Weed